The GetDetails.com Editorial staff speaks out on matters of importance.  Unafraid of sponsorship restraints or sacred cows, we tell it like it is.  Read our columnists here, updated at least weekly.  If you'd like to write a column, please click here for more information on how to join us!   We're  always looking for fresh ideas and viewpoints.  Join us at GetDetails.com.  It's All About Communication.

Comments by Scoper...Do you like my hair?

Cigs and Psych

I smoke, therefore I'm a victim. Not of the cigarette companies, but possibly of my own bad judgment, and certainly of the people who, for whatever reason, just can't stand it if they can't tell other people how to live. And you know who you are. Hey, it's kinda neat, this "victim status." Maybe I should have jumped on that whiny bandwagon earlier. 

Most everybody knows what a jury in Miami decided recently: that cigarette-makers are guilty of distributing a deadly product, and should pony up 145 billion dollars as punishment. Ignore for a moment that 145 billion is more than the gross domestic product of many countries, that it's almost twice as much as the stock value of the companies expected to pay it, and that Florida law does not allow for an award so big it would destroy a de facto legal industry. It'll be in the courts for a couple more years, at least. 

If you agree with what happened in Miami, nothing I write here will change your mind. But I'll state this for the record: the plaintiffs in that case have NO MORAL CLAIM to damages, and their legal claim exists only through a perversion of the system. The greatest civil award in world history is based on the greatest non sequitur in world history. It's a mindset I'm still struggling to understand. 

How can anyone, intelligent enough to dress himself and not make messes in the house, NOT KNOW that cigarettes are a health risk, and that once you start, it can be hard to stop? Unless you started before the mid-1960's, you DID KNOW, yet you think it's good and right that someone else be held responsible. That leaves me with another question: what do you see when you look in the mirror?

As I mentioned in an earlier essay, you don't sue a company, you sue its customers. So who ends up being punished here? Other smokers. Wait, I thought smokers were the victims here! Hmm. Maybe they'll all quit when the price gets too high. Fat chance. 

Here's another truism: you can't ban anything, you can only push it underground. There's already a smuggler's market for cigarettes; the next step is a full-fledged black market. Now we're talking violent crime, gang turf wars, and all the other ugliness that goes along with trying to save people from themselves. You may think I'm exaggerating, but there are no good scenarios here. 

And it gets even crazier. State and federal governments have been taxing cigarettes so much, and for so long, that they've painted themselves into a corner. They need that money; they count on that money. It builds roads, it funds entitlement programs, it does a lot of things politicians know they won't be re-elected without. Losing that revenue suddenly would be a budgetary nightmare. At the same time, governments will be forced to spend more for "cigarette police," as more people are criminalized who weren't criminals before. 

But really, the most disturbing part is this. There's no end to it! Now there's a court precedent that says even if you willingly partake in something that's "bad for you," someone else is to blame. Whether or not the cigarette award survives appeal, the stage is set. Fast-food joints "overserved" you, so sue them for your obesity and high cholesterol. You can't quit getting drunk, you lost your driver's license and your wife and kids left you. Sue the brewers and distillers. 

Maybe you're a teetotaler and a vegetarian. Good for you, but you're still affected, or will be, because the "pleasure police," or "lifestyle Nazis," or "nannies" or whatever some might choose to call them WILL NEVER STOP. They'll keep moving from "righteous cause" to "righteous cause," eventually targeting something that YOU like, and by then, there'll be no one to defend you. 

That's the "psych" part of this essay title, and since I'm not a shrink, I have no answer. I only know what is: a faction that derives its own happiness from controlling others. They're making war against your right to choose for yourself, and the rest of us are giving them the ammunition! 

Think I'm full of it? Come back in five years and tell me that. Meantime, consider the words of New York Times columnist Paul Krugman: "Beware the cause of a rebel without a life."

Just who is Scoper?

.

ADDITIONAL COLUMNS
Home

Allegedly
Art's Link Letters
Below The Fold
Crazy Talk
Dept. Of Huh?
Eye2Eye
Fool4Love
Full Disclosure
Get Over It
Homoerrectus
I'll Explain This Once
Patriarch's Planet
Scene & Herd
Strange Bedfellow
Technophobia
The Satyr Speaks
What The F#?K
Xona Files

ARCHIVES
GerryMander
Got Militancy?
Mandatory Ma'am
TV For Fun and Profit
The Case Against Doorbells
Freedom Of Speech
Take A Reality Pill
You've Still Got the Wrong Number
Whatsamatta U
Cell Me Another One
Baseball
A Gunlaw Even the NRA Could Love
Flower Power 2K
Are These People on Drugs?
Elian du Jour
Urban Legends
Hands Off My Coffee
Balls Of Dreams
Humanity In A Pocket
Be Free
. . .
My God, I'm Middle Aged!
I'm Offended, and You're Under Arrest!
You're Desensitized
Overload.com
Fanning the Flames
Paved With Good Intentions
Charmed Out Of A Hundred Bucks
Sis Boom Bah
Squelching the Right
He Stirred The Pot
Good Sports?
Cup O Suits
Have Another One, Congressman.
Home | Email | Message Boards | Sites | News | Sports | Weather | Voice Chat | Reference | Search | Privacy Policy

What makes GetDetails.com your first choice for information? It's all about communication. GetDetails. It's News To You!  Copyright © 1999-2000 GetDetails.com, All rights reserved.